Intelligence
Explorer.

Roo-Code through 3.54.0 contains an auto-approve bypass vulnerability that allows attackers to execute denied shell commands by exploiting a word-boundary mismatch in comment handling between the approval gate's shell parser and bash. Attackers can craft a command string with an allowlisted word immediately followed by a hash character, separator, and denied command to pass the approval gate while bash executes the denied command with the agent's auto-execute privileges on the developer's machine.

Roo-Code through 3.54.0 contains an auto-approve bypass vulnerability in the shell command parsing logic that allows attackers to execute denied shell commands by exploiting the omission of the bash pipe operator from the command parser's operator token set. Attackers can craft a command line with an allowlisted prefix followed by the stderr-redirecting pipe operator and a denied command, causing the parser to approve the full pipeline while bash executes the denied component with the agent's auto-execute privileges on the developer's machine.

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.

Code execution can occur in versions of the MLflow platform running version 0.0.1 or newer, enabling a maliciously crafted model artifact to execute arbitrary code on an end user's system when loaded by the project.

Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.

Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker with high privileges could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized write access, causing a limited disruption to availability. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.

Adobe Commerce is affected by an Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker with high privileges could leverage this vulnerability to access unauthorized files or directories outside the intended restrictions, causing a limited disruption to availability. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.

Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to gain elevated access to restricted resources. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.

Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to gain elevated access to sensitive information. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to gain elevated access to sensitive information. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

Adobe Commerce is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by an attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Scope is changed.

Adobe Commerce is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by an attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Scope is changed.

Improper verification of cryptographic signature in Skype for Business allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over an adjacent network.

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Skype for Business allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

Out-of-bounds read in Skype for Business allows an authorized attacker to deny service over a network.

Integer underflow (wrap or wraparound) in Skype for Business allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network.

Generation of error message containing sensitive information in Skype for Business allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Use of client-side authentication in Skype for Business allows an authorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Skype for Business allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Null pointer dereference in Skype for Business allows an authorized attacker to deny service over a network.

External control of file name or path in Skype for Business allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Skype for Business allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

In multiple functions of iommu.c, there is a possible out of bounds read/write due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In multiple functions of SmsController.java, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.