L/BLAB BOTSPUBLIC THREAT INTELLIGENCE NODE
CVE KNOWLEDGE BASE

Intelligence
Explorer.

Investigue vulnerabilidades por identificador, produto afetado ou descrição. Use severidade, CVSS e EPSS juntos para orientar a prioridade.

// THREAT ACTIVITY

Grupos & malware emergente

Atividade pública observada em leak sites e repositórios comunitários. Alegações de vítimas não representam confirmação independente de incidente.

RANSOMWARE GROUPSRECENT CLAIMS
N0n26 menções
Wallstreet13 menções
qilin9 menções
interlock6 menções
play5 menções
AuditTeam3 menções
Dark Project3 menções
Orova3 menções
akira3 menções
everest3 menções
INFOSTEALERSOBSERVED

Sem famílias correlacionadas no recorte recente.

RECENT RANSOMWARE CLAIMSRANSOMWARE.LIVE
iah6477alera— · Professional Services · 2026-10-15
N0nCompany #68US · Not Found · 2026-10-15
N0nCompany #67NL · Not Found · 2026-10-15
N0nCompany #66— · Not Found · 2026-10-15
N0nInterior Technologies— · Technology · 2026-10-14
qilinMOA ArchitectureSG · Professional Services · 2026-10-14
qilinJoliet Public Schools District 86US · Education · 2026-10-14
N0nTrieschmann Dumala Architectural Group— · Professional Services · 2026-10-14
WallstreetGreen ClinicUS · Healthcare · 2026-10-14
WallstreetE-Z Pack TrucksUS · Transportation · 2026-10-14
lockbit5poolegroup.com.auAU · Professional Services · 2026-10-14
lockbit5kordhotels.grGR · Hospitality · 2026-10-14
MALWARE FAMILIES / 7 DAYSMALWAREBAZAAR
Configure a Auth-Key gratuita do abuse.ch para habilitar detecções recentes do MalwareBazaar.

FONTES: RANSOMWARE.LIVE + MALWAREBAZAAR / ABUSE.CH · CACHE 1H

17979 REGISTROS ENCONTRADOSFEED 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-101049HIGH

Heym before 0.0.53 fails to verify Slack request signatures when trigger nodes lack credential IDs or have empty signing secrets. Remote unauthenticated attackers can send forged Slack events to known webhook URLs to trigger workflows with the owner's credentials.

AFFECTED SURFACEProduct not specified
CVSS 8.3EPSS 0.30%
CVE-2026-101042HIGH

Parse Server is an open-source backend server. In versions >= 9.0.0 < 9.10.1-alpha.10 and >= 8.0.2 < 8.6.91, the code-based authentication adapters (GitHub, Google Play Games, Instagram, LINE, LinkedIn, Microsoft, QQ, Spotify, WeChat, Weibo) verify the client's authorization code with the external provider on signup and on provider linking, but not when authentication data is supplied together with a username and password on the login endpoint. As a result, a low-privileged authenticated user can attach an arbitrary, unverified provider identity to their own account without the provider ever being contacted, spoofing an external identity toward application logic that trusts the linked provider ID. An attacker can also pre-hijack accounts: by claiming the provider ID of a victim who has not yet linked that provider, the victim's later legitimate sign-in with that provider resolves to the attacker's account. Only deployments configuring one of the affected code-based auth adapters are impacted. Versions 9.10.1-alpha.10 and 8.6.91 fix the issue by running the adapter's credential verification on the login and challenge endpoints and rejecting a provider identity already linked to another user. As a workaround, disable the affected code-based auth adapters.

AFFECTED SURFACEProduct not specified
CVSS 7.4EPSS 0.21%
CVE-2026-101041MEDIUM

The account recovery (password reset) functionality in the vulnerability-lookup web application contains a time-of-check-to-time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition in the consumption of single-use recovery tokens. The original implementation verified the token nonce against the stored digest and then consumed (cleared) it in separate database operations. Two concurrent HTTP requests presenting the same valid recovery token could both pass the verification check before either transaction committed, allowing both to set their own password on the target account. The last transaction to commit overwrites the first, enabling an attacker who possesses a valid recovery token to replace the legitimate user's password with one of their choosing. A secondary defect in the same endpoint (confirm_account) allowed a valid recovery link to be used to set an empty or trivially short password (e.g., three characters). The view handler performed only a manual equality comparison between the two password fields and never invoked the form's validation logic, bypassing the intended minimum-length and complexity constraints. The affected component is the user account recovery endpoint (/user/confirm_account/<token>) and the associated token verification and consumption logic in the User model (website/models/user.py) and the view layer (website/web/views/user.py).

AFFECTED SURFACEProduct not specified
CVSS 6.3EPSS 0.23%
CVE-2026-101033MEDIUM

KitchenOwl through 0.7.10 fails to verify that category IDs belong to the caller's household in expense and item operations. Authenticated attackers can enumerate category IDs from other households to read their category names, budgets, and colors, breaking household isolation.

AFFECTED SURFACEProduct not specified
CVSS 5.3EPSS 0.22%
CVE-2026-101032HIGH

navi through 2.24.0 fails to properly escape cheatsheet variable values when substituting them into shell commands. Attackers can inject shell metacharacters through crafted file names in suggestion command directories to execute arbitrary commands with victim privileges.

AFFECTED SURFACEProduct not specified
CVSS 7.3EPSS 0.15%
CVE-2026-100872HIGH

Sylius versions before 2.1.16 and 2.2.9 fail to validate payment amounts during cart recalculation, allowing unauthenticated attackers to modify order totals after gateway transaction initiation. Attackers can pay a small amount, enlarge the order after gateway capture, and have the system mark the inflated order as fully paid while the gateway captured only the original amount.

AFFECTED SURFACEProduct not specified
CVSS 8.7EPSS 0.18%
CVE-2026-100871HIGH

Sylius versions before 1.12.25, 1.13.17, 1.14.20, 2.1.16, and 2.2.9 fail to include firewall identification in JWT tokens issued by separate Admin and Shop API endpoints. Attackers can register a shop customer account using an administrator's email address and obtain a token that the Admin API resolves to that administrator, granting full administrative access.

AFFECTED SURFACEProduct not specified
CVSS 8.7EPSS 0.31%
CVE-2026-100870HIGH

Sylius versions before 1.12.25, 1.13.17, 1.14.20, 2.1.16, and 2.2.9 build administrator password-reset links using the request Host header without validation, allowing unauthenticated attackers to redirect reset tokens to attacker-controlled domains. Attackers can request password resets for known administrator email addresses with forged Host headers to intercept valid reset tokens and take over administrator accounts.

AFFECTED SURFACEProduct not specified
CVSS 8.7EPSS 0.31%
CVE-2026-100869HIGH

Sylius versions before 2.1.16 and 2.2.9 fail to restrict payment request actions in the Shop API endpoint, allowing customers to trigger refunds on completed orders. Attackers with order tokens can submit arbitrary payment actions like refunds that payment gateways execute while Sylius maintains order as paid, causing financial loss.

AFFECTED SURFACEProduct not specified
CVSS 8.2EPSS 0.26%
CVE-2026-100868MEDIUM

Penpot before 2.18.0 binds the MCP server plugin WebSocket bridge to all network interfaces without authentication in single-user mode. Unauthenticated attackers on adjacent networks can connect to the WebSocket port to impersonate the Penpot browser plugin, intercept task payloads, and return forged results to the MCP client.

AFFECTED SURFACEProduct not specified
CVSS 5.3EPSS 0.26%
CVE-2026-100867MEDIUM

spaceship-prompt through 4.22.5 fails to sanitize control characters from project manifest version fields before rendering them in the zsh prompt. Attackers can embed ANSI/OSC escape sequences in version fields of package manifests to manipulate terminal output, rewrite window titles, or spoof displayed text when victims enter the directory.

AFFECTED SURFACEProduct not specified
CVSS 4.8EPSS 0.12%
CVE-2026-100866MEDIUM

onefetch through 2.28.1 writes repository information field values to the terminal without removing control characters, allowing terminal escape sequence injection. Attackers can embed ANSI/OSC escape sequences in project manifest version and name fields to manipulate terminal output, rewrite window titles, hide text, or trigger emulator-specific behavior when victims run onefetch.

AFFECTED SURFACEProduct not specified
CVSS 4.8EPSS 0.13%
CVE-2026-97165MEDIUM

Joomla Extension - svenbluege.de - Reflected XSS and open redirect in Event Gallery extension < 6.5.0 - The “return” parameter is base64-decoded and written to the “Back” link without being validated.

AFFECTED SURFACEProduct not specified
CVSS 5.3EPSS 0.24%
CVE-2026-97164HIGH

Joomla Extension - svenbluege.de - Authenticated arbitrary path deletion in `clear cache` task in Event Gallery extension < 6.5.0 - Using the `images` parameter of the `cache.process` task, you can recursively delete any directories that the web server is authorized to write to.

AFFECTED SURFACEProduct not specified
CVSS 7.0EPSS 0.31%
CVE-2026-100749MEDIUM

Joomla Extension - svenbluege.de - CSRF in backend cleanup actions in Event Gallery extension < 6.5.0 - Only orphaned file entries and shopping carts that are older than 30 days will be deleted.

AFFECTED SURFACEProduct not specified
CVSS 5.1EPSS 0.15%
CVE-2026-100748MEDIUM

Joomla Extension - svenbluege.de - CSRF in various cart actions in Event Gallery extension < 6.5.0

AFFECTED SURFACEProduct not specified
CVSS 6.9EPSS 0.15%
CVE-2026-100747MEDIUM

Joomla Extension - svenbluege.de - CSRF in image upload in Event Gallery extension < 6.5.0 - Due to lack of an CSRF token check, a third-party site can upload files to an event and overwrite existing files with the same name.

AFFECTED SURFACEProduct not specified
CVSS 5.1EPSS 0.15%
CVE-2026-94417LOW

When an application enables both OCSP and CRL revocation checking on one WOLFSSL_CTX or certificate manager, wolfSSL skips the CRL check for any peer certificate that carries no Authority Information Access OCSP URL, and accepts a certificate the loaded CRL lists as revoked. The soft-fail policy for a missing responder collapses the OCSP result onto success before the code decides whether the CRL fallback is still needed, so "no responder exists" becomes indistinguishable from "the responder answered good". Affected builds define both HAVE_OCSP and HAVE_CRL: --enable-ocsp --enable-crl directly, and implicitly --enable-all, --enable-distro, --enable-curl, --enable-nginx, --enable-haproxy, --enable-stunnel, --enable-lighty, --enable-wpas, --enable-strongswan, --enable-mosquitto, --enable-jni, --enable-openvpn and --enable-krb. An application is affected only if it calls both wolfSSL_CTX_EnableOCSP() (or wolfSSL_EnableOCSP() / wolfSSL_CertManagerEnableOCSP()) and wolfSSL_CTX_EnableCRL() (or the equivalents) with a CRL loaded; an application that uses OCSP stapling alone through wolfSSL_CTX_EnableOCSPStapling() is not affected, because that sets up a separate OCSP instance. The defect sits in ProcessPeerCerts() and is reachable over TLS 1.0 through TLS 1.3 and DTLS, both on a client verifying a server certificate and on a server verifying a client certificate under mutual or post-handshake authentication. When the skipped check falls on a chain certificate rather than the leaf, the unchecked intermediate is promoted into the certificate manager and stays a trusted signer for every later connection on that context, so an affected long-running process needs its WOLFSSL_CTX torn down and not only its library replaced. All wolfSSL versions from 5.9.2 and earlier are affected; on versions 5.9.1 and 5.9.2 the WOLFSSL_OCSP_CHECKALL configuration fails closed with OCSP_NEED_URL, which leaves wolfSSL_CTX_EnableOCSP() without CHECKALL as the exposed configuration on 5.9.2.

AFFECTED SURFACEProduct not specified
CVSS 2.3EPSS 0.18%
CVE-2026-93304MEDIUM

A (D)TLS 1.2 client can accept a ChangeCipherSpec message before it has sent its ClientKeyExchange. No master secret has been derived at that point, so the client installs read keys derived from a known (deterministic) key and checks the server's Finished against that same key. An out-of-order ChangeCipherSpec can therefore be used by an attacker to complete the handshake in place of the server and send data the client accepts as authentic. The client's own traffic still uses correctly derived keys, so the attacker cannot read it, and the genuine server never completes the handshake. DTLS 1.2 clients are exposed because a datagram read can deliver the out-of-order records on its own. TLS 1.2 clients are exposed when the application supplies received bytes with wolfSSL_inject() or enables read ahead. For certificate suites, the attacker must be in a man-in-the-middle position. For PSK (Pre Shared Key) connections, any fake server can succeed without knowing the PSK.

AFFECTED SURFACEProduct not specified
CVSS 6.3EPSS 0.19%
CVE-2026-93302HIGH

MatchTrustedPeer ignores the public key used, leading to forged CA clones passing verification. Affected builds are any that enable the macro WOLFSSL_TRUST_PEER_CERT and load CA certificates with wolfSSL_CTX_trust_peer_cert() or wolfSSL_trust_peer_cert(). The peer must know the certificates being loaded to either of those APIs to take advantage of the issue. When OPENSSL_COMPATIBLE_DEFAULTS is also defined this widens the affected API to include all CA certificate loading. Both macros are defined when using autoconf builds such as (nginx, haproxy, stunnel, wpas, apache httpd, hitch, bind, rsyslog, ffmpeg, all, distro). When the certificate is listed as a trusted peer certificate the issue previously allowed for a malicious (D)TLS server to bypass authentication once knowing which CA’s the client would accept. This also affects mutual authentication cases where the client knows which CA’s the server has loaded. If building with any of these configurations and using (D)TLS where the loaded CA’s could be known and authentication of the peer is desired, users should either: update to the latest wolfSSL version, apply the fix patch, or use the configure flag --disable-openssl-compatible-defaults and not load CA’s with wolfSSL_CTX_trust_peer_cert() or wolfSSL_trust_peer_cert() to mitigate the issue.

AFFECTED SURFACEProduct not specified
CVSS 8.3EPSS 0.29%
CVE-2026-89136HIGH

When using RPK (Raw Public Key), the client side of a TLS 1.2, 1.3 and DTLS 1.2 connection could accept an unsolicited server_cert_type=RawPublicKey which allowed a malicious or misbehaving server to bypass authentication. RPK is off by default and only enabled in --enable-rpk OR --enable-all OR --enable-distro AKA HAVE_RPK builds.

AFFECTED SURFACEProduct not specified
CVSS 8.3EPSS 0.55%
CVE-2026-89135MEDIUM

A failed X509_verify_cert call permanently plants an unverified attacker CA in the shared CertManager, bypassing certificate validation in every type-blind sibling consumer (native TLS, OCSP, CRL, direct CM verify). This affects version 5.8.4 through 5.9.2 of wolfSSL with the macros (OPENSSL_EXTRA && !NO_CERTS && !WOLFCRYPT_ONLY) defined or built with --enable-opensslextra and the application is specifically making calls to the X509_verify_cert function.

AFFECTED SURFACEProduct not specified
CVSS 6.3EPSS 0.21%
CVE-2026-89134MEDIUM

A certificate with no dNSName SAN but another SAN type present (e.g. registeredID or iPAddress) bypassed the Subject CN dNSName name-constraint check. The CN-as-DNS fallback was gated on cert->subjectCN != NULL && cert->altNames == NULL && !cert->isCA instead of "no dNSName SAN", so an out-of-scope CN was accepted. This incomplete fix from CVE-2026-6731, leading to the name-constraint check issue, was introduced in wolfSSL version 5.9.2.

AFFECTED SURFACEProduct not specified
CVSS 6.3EPSS 0.14%
CVE-2026-89133MEDIUM

wolfSSL versions 5.9.2 and earlier contain a flaw in the X.509 certificate validation logic where it fails to properly enforce NameConstraints extensions when there is an unconstrained CA tier between a name-constrained intermediate CA and the leaf certificate. wolfSSL incorrectly accepted certificates for hostnames they shouldn't be allowed to cover, due to a chain-walking state-machine bug that resets the validation state when encountering an intermediate without NameConstraints, thereby bypassing cryptographic delegation controls. This defect exists in the default build configuration that makes use of certificates where name constraint extensions are used. Thanks to Jack Lloyd, PathDiff, and Ben Smyth for reporting the issue.

AFFECTED SURFACEProduct not specified
CVSS 6.3EPSS 0.15%